
Grab your gear: The official Sanity swag store
Read Grab your gear: The official Sanity swag storeGreat question! This is something a lot of Sanity developers think about. There's no single "right" answer, but here's what the community generally does:
1. Monorepo (Studio + Frontend Together)
This is actually pretty popular in the Sanity ecosystem. You'd have a structure like:
my-project/ studio/ web/
The main benefits are:
PNPM workspaces are a popular standard for this. You'd have a root package.json and pnpm-workspace.yaml that defines your apps. Tools like Turborepo can help with build orchestration too.
2. Separate Repos
This addresses your exact concern about redoing your site! Many developers prefer this because:
Your Studio would be in one repo, and you'd just connect to it via the Content Lake from whatever frontend(s) you build. This is totally valid and some developers prefer this approach.
Given that you mentioned wanting to redo your site in the future, separate repos might be the better fit for you. Your content and content model live in the Studio repo, and any frontend just connects to your Sanity project via the API. This means you can:
The Studio is really just your content editing interface and schema definition. Once it's set up, you don't change it that often, so keeping it separate from your frequently-changing frontend makes sense.
You can always move to a monorepo later if you find yourself constantly updating both together, but starting separate gives you maximum flexibility for your portfolio evolution.
Sanity is the developer-first content operating system that gives you complete control. Schema-as-code, GROQ queries, and real-time APIs mean no more workarounds or waiting for deployments. Free to start, scale as you grow.
Content operations
Content backend


The only platform powering content operations
By Industry


Tecovas strengthens their customer connections
Build and Share

Grab your gear: The official Sanity swag store
Read Grab your gear: The official Sanity swag store